Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39339704›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Nutrient Analysis of Raw United States Beef Offal Items.

Hannah F Fuerniss, Cody L Gifford, Emma G Mortensen, Keith E Belk, Terry E Engle, Dale R Woerner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah F FuernissCenter for Meat Safety & Quality, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Cody L GiffordDepartment of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
Emma G MortensenDepartment of Animal & Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Keith E BelkCenter for Meat Safety & Quality, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Terry E EngleCenter for Meat Safety & Quality, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Dale R WoernerDepartment of Animal & Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2063-4807

Funding

The Beef Checkoff NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrient composition of beef offal was evaluated to expand availability of nutrient data for the following beef items: beef heart, liver, kidney, tongue, honeycomb tripe, oxtail, marrow bones, testicles, and blood. These items are consumed both domestically and internationally, with significant regional variations that can be contributed to unique cultural meals and dietary patterns. Standardized procedures were used to dissect and homogenize beef offal samples. Nutrient analysis occurred at United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service-approved laboratories using validated methods and standards. Each of the offal items in the study qualified for at least one "Good Source" or "Excellent Source" nutrient labeling claim as defined by the United States Food and Drug Administration, based on composition of the separable lean component. This study provides analytically derived nutrient information for U.S. beef offal items. The results reflect that these products could be beneficial in providing essential nutrients as a component of a healthy diet.

Indexed as

Nutritive ValueRed MeatAnimalsCattleFood AnalysisFood LabelingHumansUnited Statesanalysisbeefnutrientnutritionoffalvariety meat

Identifiers

PMID39339704
PMCPMC11435426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.