Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39339667›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Dietary Adherence to Recommendations among a Cohort of Adults and Teens with Celiac Disease Maintaining a Gluten-Free Diet Compared to a Nationally Representative Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Jennifer W Cadenhead, Anne R Lee, Thanh Thanh T Nguyen, Benjamin Lebwohl, Peter H R Green, Randi L Wolf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer W CadenheadProgram in Nutrition, Department of Health Studies & Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5922-3597
Anne R LeeCeliac Disease Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Thanh Thanh T NguyenProgram in Nutrition, Department of Health Studies & Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6552-998X
Benjamin LebwohlCeliac Disease Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Peter H R GreenCeliac Disease Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6839-9634
Randi L WolfProgram in Nutrition, Department of Health Studies & Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
Creating Opportunities for Unparalleled Researchers to Achieve Growth and Excellence (COURAGE)U24DK132733 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MORONE, NATALIA E., STANFORD, FATIMA CODY · 2022 to 2025
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000040NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK132733NIH NIDDK U24DK132733Teachers College, Columbia University Provost Investment Fund and Dean's Doctoral Dissertation Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease (CeD) is a common autoimmune condition, with a prevalence of ~1%. Currently, a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only treatment option. Due to fortification rules excluding gluten-free products in the United States of America (U.S.A.), understanding the nutritional adequacy of a GFD is important for promoting optimal health among those with CeD. Cross-sectional examination of multiple 24 h dietary recalls from a study sample of 50 adults and 30 teens with CeD was used to determine nutritional adequacy and excesses according to U.S.A. recommendations. The results were compared with those of 15,777 adults and 2296 teens from a nationally representative sample not reporting CeD, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009-2014. Compared with NHANES, our study population was more at risk of low folate and carbohydrate (adults) consumption, and of excessive niacin and vitamin A (teens), as well as saturated and total fat consumption (adults). Overall, though, compared with NHANES, our study participants had similar nutrient concerns but fewer nutritional imbalances, with some notable exceptions. In addition to maintaining a GFD, individuals with CeD should be counseled to maintain a balanced diet and to pay attention to nutrient-dense foods. Special attention should be given to teens in providing dietary counseling to potentially mitigate the risk of future morbidity.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseDiet, Gluten-FreeNutrition SurveysAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPatient ComplianceUnited StatesYoung Adultceliac diseaseexcess nutrientsnutrient adequacynutrient concernsnutrition

Identifiers

PMID39339667
PMCPMC11435366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.