Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39339608›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Microgreens Production: Exploiting Environmental and Cultural Factors for Enhanced Agronomical Benefits.

Shiva Dubey, Niamh Harbourne, Mary Harty, Daniel Hurley, Caroline Elliott-Kingston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shiva DubeySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0007-1541-7449
Niamh HarbourneSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6894-4353
Mary HartySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8463-0557
Daniel HurleySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2487-0831
Caroline Elliott-KingstonSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3695-1858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An exponential growth in global population is expected to reach nine billion by 2050, demanding a 70% increase in agriculture productivity, thus illustrating the impact of global crop production on the environment and the importance of achieving greater agricultural yields. Globally, the variety of high-quality microgreens is increasing through indoor farming at both small and large scales. The major concept of Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) seeks to provide an alternative to traditional agricultural cultivation. Microgreens have become popular in the twenty-first century as a food in the salad category that can fulfil some nutrient requirements. Microgreens are young seedlings that offer a wide spectrum of colours, flavours, and textures, and are characterised as a "functional food" due to their nutraceutical properties. Extensive research has shown that the nutrient profile of microgreens can be desirably tailored by preharvest cultivation and postharvest practices. This study provides new insight into two major categories, (i) environmental and (ii) cultural, responsible for microgreens' growth and aims to explore the various agronomical factors involved in microgreens production. In addition, the review summarises recent studies that show these factors have a significant influence on microgreens development and nutritional composition.

Indexed as

controlled environment agriculture (CEA)food securitymicrogreensnutritional profileseed density

Identifiers

PMID39339608
PMCPMC11435253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.