ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Streamlining of Simple Sequence Repeat Data Mining Methodologies and Pipelines for Crop Scanning.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and Development of Pathogen- and Pest-Specific Defense-Resistance-Associated SSR Marker Candidates Assisted by Machine Learning and Discovery of Putative QTL Hotspots inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of whole-genome SSR markers in sugar beet (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Genome-Wide Microsatellites inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Dissecting the genetic diversity of cultivated tomato (3 Biotech · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic markers are powerful tools for understanding genetic diversity and the molecular basis of traits, ushering in a new era of molecular breeding in crops. Over the past 50 years, DNA markers have rapidly changed, moving from hybridization-based and second-generation-based to sequence-based markers. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are the ideal markers in plant breeding, and they have numerous desirable properties, including their repeatability, codominance, multi-allelic nature, and locus specificity. They can be generated from any species, which requires prior sequence knowledge. SSRs may serve as evolutionary tuning knobs, allowing for rapid identification and adaptation to new circumstances. The evaluations published thus far have mostly ignored SSR polymorphism and gene evolution due to a lack of data regarding the precise placements of SSRs on chromosomes. However, NGS technologies have made it possible to produce high-throughput SSRs for any species using massive volumes of genomic sequence data that can be generated fast and at a minimal cost. Though SNP markers are gradually replacing the erstwhile DNA marker systems, SSRs remain the markers of choice in orphan crops due to the lack of genomic resources at the reference level and their adaptability to resource-limited labor. Several bioinformatic approaches and tools have evolved to handle genomic sequences to identify SSRs and generate primers for genotyping applications in plant breeding projects. This paper includes the currently available methodologies for producing SSR markers, genomic resource databases, and computational tools/pipelines for SSR data mining and primer generation. This review aims to provide a 'one-stop shop' of information to help each new user carefully select tools for identifying and utilizing SSRs in genetic research and breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.