Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39339594›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Streamlining of Simple Sequence Repeat Data Mining Methodologies and Pipelines for Crop Scanning.

Subramaniam Geethanjali, Palchamy Kadirvel, Mahender Anumalla, Nithyananth Hemanth Sadhana, Anandan Annamalai, Jauhar Ali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome-Wide Microsatellites inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Subramaniam GeethanjaliDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, India.
Palchamy KadirvelCrop Improvement Section, ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 500030, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4907-2796
Mahender AnumallaRice Breeding Innovation Platform, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños 4031, Laguna, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0003-4492-4005
Nithyananth Hemanth SadhanaDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, India.
Anandan AnnamalaiIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Indian Institute of Seed Science, Bengaluru 560065, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0560-970X
Jauhar AliRice Breeding Innovation Platform, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños 4031, Laguna, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-3177-2607

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) for providing a research grant to JA for the Green Super Rice Project OPP1130530.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic markers are powerful tools for understanding genetic diversity and the molecular basis of traits, ushering in a new era of molecular breeding in crops. Over the past 50 years, DNA markers have rapidly changed, moving from hybridization-based and second-generation-based to sequence-based markers. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are the ideal markers in plant breeding, and they have numerous desirable properties, including their repeatability, codominance, multi-allelic nature, and locus specificity. They can be generated from any species, which requires prior sequence knowledge. SSRs may serve as evolutionary tuning knobs, allowing for rapid identification and adaptation to new circumstances. The evaluations published thus far have mostly ignored SSR polymorphism and gene evolution due to a lack of data regarding the precise placements of SSRs on chromosomes. However, NGS technologies have made it possible to produce high-throughput SSRs for any species using massive volumes of genomic sequence data that can be generated fast and at a minimal cost. Though SNP markers are gradually replacing the erstwhile DNA marker systems, SSRs remain the markers of choice in orphan crops due to the lack of genomic resources at the reference level and their adaptability to resource-limited labor. Several bioinformatic approaches and tools have evolved to handle genomic sequences to identify SSRs and generate primers for genotyping applications in plant breeding projects. This paper includes the currently available methodologies for producing SSR markers, genomic resource databases, and computational tools/pipelines for SSR data mining and primer generation. This review aims to provide a 'one-stop shop' of information to help each new user carefully select tools for identifying and utilizing SSRs in genetic research and breeding programs.

Indexed as

genomic resourcesmicrosatellite databasesmicrosatellitesmolecular markersprimer designingsimple sequence repeatsSSR data mining

Identifiers

PMID39339594
PMCPMC11435353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.