Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39339515›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Water Management Interventions, Organic Fertilization, and Harvest Time in Dry Land in the Biosaline Production of Cactus Pear.

Tarcia Carielle Miranda Dantas Nunes, Gherman Garcia Leal de Araújo, Thieres George Freire da Silva, Tadeu Vinhas Voltolini, Glayciane Costa Gois, Cleyton de Almeida Araújo, Anderson de Moura Zanine, Daniele de Jesus Ferreira, Danillo Marte Pereira, Francisco Naysson de Sousa Santos and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tarcia Carielle Miranda Dantas NunesDepartment of Animal Science, Center for Agricultural Science Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina 56300-990, PE, Brazil.
Gherman Garcia Leal de AraújoDepartment of Animal Production, Embrapa Semiárido, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Petrolina 56302-970, PE, Brazil.
Thieres George Freire da SilvaAcademic Unit of Serra Talhada, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Serra Talhada 56909-535, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8355-4935
Tadeu Vinhas VoltoliniDepartment of Animal Production, Embrapa Semiárido, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Petrolina 56302-970, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-8103
Glayciane Costa GoisDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Chapadinha, Maranhão 65500-000, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-1825
Cleyton de Almeida AraújoDepartment of Animal Science and Pasture, Universidade Federal do Agreste de Pernambuco, Garanhuns 55292-270, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3636-2890
Anderson de Moura ZanineDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Chapadinha, Maranhão 65500-000, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0100-3652
Daniele de Jesus FerreiraDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Chapadinha, Maranhão 65500-000, MA, Brazil.
Danillo Marte PereiraDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Areia 58051-900, PB, Brazil.
Francisco Naysson de Sousa SantosDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Chapadinha, Maranhão 65500-000, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6968-1738
Henrique Nunes ParenteDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Chapadinha, Maranhão 65500-000, MA, Brazil.
Silvia Helena Nogueira TurcoPostgraduate Program in Agricultural Engineering, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina 56300-990, PE, Brazil.
Michelle de Oliveira Maia ParentePostgraduate Program in Tropical Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina 64049-550, PI, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6906-7455
Fleming Sena CamposDepartment of Animal Science and Pasture, Universidade Federal do Agreste de Pernambuco, Garanhuns 55292-270, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9027-3210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brackish water can promote physicochemical changes in the soil. Aiming to mitigate the effect of excess salts in the soil, the use of organic matter promotes restructuring. The aim was to evaluate the productive and nutritional characteristics of cactus pear under different brackish water depths (ID) and levels of organic matter (OM). A factorial arrangement of 4 × 4 × 4 with four replications was utilized. Plots consisted of ID (0, 12, 20, and 28% reference evapotranspiration-ETo), and subplots were composed of OM levels (0, 15, 30, and 45 t/ha) and days after planting (DAP; 180, 270, 360, and 450 days). The growth, yield, and chemical composition of cactus pear were affected by ID and OM and/or by their interaction. The regular and increasing application of ID from 192 to 456 mm/year and a rainfall of 110 mm/year in cactus pear crops in biosaline systems improves the growth, freshness, dry matter yields, accumulation capacity per unit area, and chemical composition of cactus pear. The increase in OM up to the range from 30 to 45 Mg/ha linearly increases the agronomic performance of cactus pear. Biosaline systems with cactus pear should be adopted with the combined use of regular supplementary ID and OM, measuring at 304 mm/year and 45 Mg/ha, respectively.

Indexed as

biosaline agriculturebrackish waterOpuntia strict (HAW.)

Identifiers

PMID39339515
PMCPMC11434915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.