Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39339189›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2024

Pharmacological Prescription at the End of Life: Quality Assessment in the Transition of Care to a Community Palliative Care Support Team.

Inês Rodrigues, Hugo Ribeiro, Carolina Costa, João Rocha-Neves, Marília Dourado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Opioid prescribing patterns at the end of life in an asian advanced cancer cohort: differences by palliative care consultation status.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inês RodriguesCommunity Palliative Care Support Team Gaia, R. Bartolomeu Dias 316, 4430-043 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Hugo RibeiroCommunity Palliative Care Support Team Gaia, R. Bartolomeu Dias 316, 4430-043 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6623-7420
Carolina CostaFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-219 Porto, Portugal.
João Rocha-NevesFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-219 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2656-8935
Marília DouradoFaculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appropriate pharmacological management is a cornerstone of quality in palliative care (PC), focusing on comfort and quality of life. Therapeutic review is crucial in PC, aiming to optimize symptom relief, reduce adverse effects, and manage drug interactions. This study aims to delve into the real-world pharmacological prescription practices within a Community Palliative Care Support Team (CPCST) in the northern region of Portugal, comparing practices at admission and at the last consultation before death. It is an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study without intervention involving patients admitted to a CPCST in 2021. Data were obtained from clinical records, and the statistical analysis included descriptive and inferential measures. Sixty-four patients were included, with an average age of 77.34 years, referred mainly by a specialized Hospital Palliative Care Support Team (65.63%). Polypharmacy was present, with a significant increase in opioids, antipsychotics, prokinetics, antiemetics, antispasmodics, and local corticosteroids, and a reduction in drugs for peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux treatment, antithrombotics, hypolipidemics, antihypertensives, and antidiabetics, among others. The oral route was preferred, decreasing between the two analyzed moments (85.5% versus 49.1%). Pro re nata (PRN) medications increased significantly (

Indexed as

deprescribinghome carepalliative medicinepharmacological adequacypolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID39339189
PMCPMC11434967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.