ArticlePharmaceutics2024
A Meta-Analysis Methodology in Stan to Estimate Population Pharmacokinetic Parameters from Multiple Aggregate Concentration-Time Datasets: Application to Gevokizumab mPBPK Model.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A physics-informed neural network approach for estimating population-level pharmacokinetic parameters from aggregated concentration data.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Determination of Systemic MIC Breakpoints for Intermittent, Extended, and Continuous Infusion Dosage Regimens of Mecillinam.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate the performance of a methodology to estimate the population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters along with the inter-individual variabilities (IIVs) from patients' reported aggregate concentration-time data, in particular, mean plasma concentrations and their standard deviations (SDs) versus time, such as those often found in published graphs. This method was applied to the published data of gevokizumab, a novel monoclonal anti-interleukin-1β antibody, in order to estimate the drug's population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) parameters of a second-generation minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model. Assuming this mPBPK model, a mixed effects approach was utilized to allow accounting for the random inter-group variability (IGV) that was assumed among different dosage groups. The entire analysis was performed using R software (Rstudio) and the Bayesian software tool RStan was used for the application of Bayesian priors on the parameters. Conclusively, the proposed method could be applied to monoclonal antibodies for which the second-generation mPBPK model has been proposed as well as to other drugs with different PK models when only a published graph with aggregate concentration-time data is available. In addition, the method could be used when multiple aggregate datasets from different sources need to be combined in a meta-analysis approach in order to estimate the PopPK parameters of a drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.