ArticlePharmaceutics2024
A Critical Analysis of the CFD-DEM Simulation of Pharmaceutical Aerosols Deposition in Upper Intra-Thoracic Airways: Considerations on Aerosol Transport and Deposition.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Monte Carlo-Based 3D Whole Lung Model for Aerosol Deposition Studies: Implementation and Validation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reliability and accuracy of numerical models and computer simulations to study aerosol deposition in the human respiratory system is investigated for a patient-specific tracheobronchial tree geometry. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model coupled with discrete elements methods (DEM) is used to predict the transport and deposition of the aerosol. The results are compared to experimental and numerical data available in the literature to study and quantify the impact of the modeling parameters and numerical assumptions. Even if the total deposition compares very well with the reference data, it is clear from the present work how local deposition results can depend significantly upon spatial discretization and boundary conditions adopted to represent the respiratory act. The modeling of turbulent fluctuations in the airflow is also found to impact the local deposition and, to a minor extent, the flow characteristics at the inlet of the computational domain. Using the CFD-DEM model, it was also possible to calculate the airflow and particles splitting at bifurcations, which were found to depart from the assumption of being equally distributed among branches adopted by some of the simplified deposition models. The results thus suggest the need for further studies towards improving the quantitative prediction of aerosol transport and deposition in the human airways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.