Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39339064›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Investigating Additive Manufacturing Possibilities for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Polymeric Materials.

Laura Šostakaitė, Edvardas Šapranauskas, Darius Rudinskas, Arvydas Rimkus, Viktor Gribniak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura ŠostakaitėDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Linkmenų Str. 28-4, 08217 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Edvardas ŠapranauskasDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Linkmenų Str. 28-4, 08217 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Darius RudinskasDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Linkmenų Str. 28-4, 08217 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-0238-8726
Arvydas RimkusLaboratory of Innovative Building Structures, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Sauletekio Av. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-3257-5936
Viktor GribniakDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Linkmenų Str. 28-4, 08217 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-8296-0037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication, also known as fused deposition modeling and 3D printing, is the most common additive manufacturing technology due to its cost-effectiveness and customization flexibility compared to existing alternatives. It may revolutionize unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) design and fabrication. Therefore, this study hypothesizes the 3D printing possibility of UAV using a simple desktop printer and polymeric material. The extensive literature analysis identified the acceptable prototyping object and polymeric material. Thus, the research focuses on applying polylactic acid (PLA) in manufacturing the flying wing-type UAV and develops a fabrication concept to replicate arial vehicles initially produced from a mixture of expanded polystyrene and polyethylene. The material choice stems from PLA's non-toxicity, ease of fabrication, and cost-effectiveness. Alongside ordinary PLA, this study includes lightweight PLA to investigate the mechanical performance of this advanced material, which changes its density depending on the printing temperature. This proof-of-concept study explores the mechanical properties of printed parts of the wing prototype. It also considers the possibility of fragmentation in fabricated objects because of the limitations of printing space. The simplified bending tests identified significant reserves in the mechanical performance regarding the theoretical resistance of the material in the wing prototype, which proves the raised hypothesis and delivers the object for further optimization. Focusing on the mechanical resistance, this study ignored rheology and durability issues, which require additional investigations. Fabricating the wing of the exact geometry reveals acceptable precision of the 3D printing processes but highlights the problematic technology issues requiring further resolution.

Indexed as

3D printingbending testmechanical performancepolylactic acid (PLA)prototyping

Identifiers

PMID39339064
PMCPMC11435237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.