Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39339024›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Effect of Cutting Conditions on the Size of Dust Particles Generated during Milling of Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Composite Materials.

Štěpánka Dvořáčková, Dora Kroisová, Tomáš Knápek, Martin Váňa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Štěpánka DvořáčkováAssembly and Engineering Metrology, Department of Machining, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4029-2717
Dora KroisováAssembly and Engineering Metrology, Department of Machining, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2583-2204
Tomáš KnápekAssembly and Engineering Metrology, Department of Machining, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-7993
Martin VáňaAssembly and Engineering Metrology, Department of Machining, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Liberec, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0002-5847-4068

Funding

Technical University of Liberec SGS-2024-5456-Influence of process parameters on quality of machining biocomposites systems
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional dry machining (without process media) of carbon fibre composite materials (CFRP) produces tiny chips/dust particles that float in the air and cause health hazards to the machining operator. The present study investigates the effect of cutting conditions (cutting speed, feed per tooth and depth of cut) during CFRP milling on the size, shape and amount of harmful dust particles. For the present study, one type of cutting tool (CVD diamond-coated carbide) was used directly for machining CFRP. The analysis of harmful dust particles was carried out on a Tescan Mira 3 (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) scanning electron microscope and a Keyence VK-X 1000 (Keyence, Itasca, IL, USA) confocal microscope. The results show that with the combination of higher feed per tooth (mm) and lower cutting speed, for specific CFRP materials, the size and shape of harmful dust particles is reduced. Particles ranging in size from 2.2 to 99 μm were deposited on the filters. Smaller particles were retained on the tool body (1.7 to 40 μm). Similar particle sizes were deposited on the machine and in the work area.

Indexed as

CFRPdust particleselectron microscopymillingrespiratory hazards

Identifiers

PMID39339024
PMCPMC11435035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.