Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Ankita ChakrabortyDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.
Prasana Kumar RathDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4854-5961
Susen Kumar PandaDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.
Bidyut Prava MishraDepartment of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1597-3764
Manaswini DehuriDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology (OUAT), Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2491-4045
Sangram BiswalDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology (OUAT), Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.
Manoj Kumar JenaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-8539
Basanta Pravas SahuSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Biswaranjan PaitalRedox Regulation Laboratory, Department of Zoology, College of Basic Science and Humanities, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5285-6578
Dipak Kumar SahooVeterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3748-3395
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate pathological epidemiology and molecular confirmation of
Indexed as
Dog DiseasesEhrlichia canisEhrlichiosisAnimalsDogsFemaleIndiaMalePrevalenceTick InfestationsCanine Ehrlichiosisdog’s pathophysiologyEhrlichia epidemiologymolecular identificationp28 geneticksultrasonography
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Molecular Confirmation, Epidemiology, and Pathophysiology of · full record | OpenQuestion