ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Optimizing Real-Time MI-BCI Performance in Post-Stroke Patients: Impact of Time Window Duration on Classification Accuracy and Responsiveness.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A bibliometric analysis of electroencephalogram research in stroke: current trends and future directions.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Decoding motor imagery related to major mimetic muscles from electroencephalography.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Review
- Classification of Different Motor Imagery Tasks with the Same Limb Using Electroencephalographic Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Addressing the Paradox of Rest with Innovative Technologies.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2025Article
- Multidimensional EEG features integration with feature selection strategy for precision diagnosis of depressive disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Real-world evaluation of deep learning decoders for motor imagery EEG-based BCIs.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025Article
- An Integrative Framework for Healthcare Recommendation Systems: Leveraging the Linear Discriminant Wolf-Convolutional Neural Network (LDW-CNN) Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are promising tools for motor neurorehabilitation. Achieving a balance between classification accuracy and system responsiveness is crucial for real-time applications. This study aimed to assess how the duration of time windows affects performance, specifically classification accuracy and the false positive rate, to optimize the temporal parameters of MI-BCI systems. We investigated the impact of time window duration on classification accuracy and false positive rate, employing Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) on data acquired from six post-stroke patients and on the external BCI IVa dataset. EEG signals were recorded and processed using the Common Spatial Patterns (CSP) algorithm for feature extraction. Our results indicate that longer time windows generally enhance classification accuracy and reduce false positives across all classifiers, with LDA performing the best. However, to maintain the real-time responsiveness, crucial for practical applications, a balance must be struck. The results suggest an optimal time window of 1-2 s, offering a trade-off between classification performance and excessive delay to guarantee the system responsiveness. These findings underscore the importance of temporal optimization in MI-BCI systems to improve usability in real rehabilitation scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.