ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Improving the Accuracy of mmWave Radar for Ethical Patient Monitoring in Mental Health Settings.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring patient safety in high-risk mental health environments is a challenge for clinical staff. There has been a recent increase in the adoption of contactless sensing solutions for remote patient monitoring. mmWave radar is a technology that has high potential in this field due it its low cost and protection of privacy; however, it is prone to multipath reflections and other sources of environmental noise. This paper discusses some of the challenges in mmWave remote sensing applications for patient safety in mental health wards. In line with these challenges, we propose a novel low-data solution to mitigate the impact of multipath reflections and other sources of noise in mmWave sensing. Our solution uses an unscented Kalman filter for target tracking over time and analyses features of movement to determine whether targets are human or not. We chose a commercial off-the-shelf radar and compared the accuracy and reliability of sensor measurements before and after applying our solution. Our results show a marked decrease in false positives and false negatives during human target tracking, as well as an improvement in spatial location detection in a two-dimensional space. These improvements demonstrate how a simple low-data solution can improve existing mmWave sensors, making them more suitable for patient safety solutions in high-risk environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.