ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Bee Together: Joining Bee Audio Datasets for Hive Extrapolation in AI-Based Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Beehive health monitoring has gained interest in the study of bees in biology, ecology, and agriculture. As audio sensors are less intrusive, a number of audio datasets (mainly labeled with the presence of a queen in the hive) have appeared in the literature, and interest in their classification has been raised. All studies have exhibited good accuracy, and a few have questioned and revealed that classification cannot be generalized to unseen hives. To increase the number of known hives, a review of open datasets is described, and a merger in the form of the "BeeTogether" dataset on the open Kaggle platform is proposed. This common framework standardizes the data format and features while providing data augmentation techniques and a methodology for measuring hives' extrapolation properties. A classical classifier is proposed to benchmark the whole dataset, achieving the same good accuracy and poor hive generalization as those found in the literature. Insight into the role of the frequency of the classification of the presence of a queen is provided, and it is shown that this frequency mostly depends on a colony's belonging. New classifiers inspired by contrastive learning are introduced to circumvent the effect of colony belonging and obtain both good accuracy and hive extrapolation abilities when learning changes in labels. A process for obtaining absolute labels was prototyped on an unsupervised dataset. Solving hive extrapolation with a common open platform and contrastive approach can result in effective applications in agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.