ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Comparison of Faster R-CNN, YOLO, and SSD for Third Molar Angle Detection in Dental Panoramic X-rays.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Revolutionizing diagnosis of pulmonaryFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- DentSeg3: A Three-Branch Specialized Fusion Network for Dental Lesion Segmentation in Color Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning-enhanced detection of dental restorations and orthodontic appliances in panoramic radiographs using a clinically annotated dataset.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Powered Real-Time Coronary Stenosis Recognition and Quantification in Angiography.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Third Molar Extraction Difficulty and Nerve Injury Risk Using Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Detection and Classification of Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Using a Deep Learning Approach.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Dental Caries Diagnosis: A Modality-Stratified Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimization of potential targets for antidepressant Chinese medicines: AI and multi-omics methods.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Using swin UNETR deep model for automated detection of alveolar bone fenestration/dehiscence in CBCT.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- ISD-YOLO: A lightweight and efficient feature extraction network for invoice seal detection.PloS one · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Trajectory Planning of Dentatron: A Compact 4-DOF Dental Robotic Manipulator.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance of artificial intelligence-based diagnosis and classification of peri-implantitis compared with periodontal surgeon assessment: a pilot study of panoramic radiograph analysis.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
- Multi-Scale Attention Networks with Feature Refinement for Medical Item Classification in Intelligent Healthcare Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance of two different artificial intelligence models in dental implant planning among four different implant planning software: a comparative study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence algorithms (AI) has gained importance for dental applications in recent years. Analyzing AI information from different sensor data such as images or panoramic radiographs (panoramic X-rays) can help to improve medical decisions and achieve early diagnosis of different dental pathologies. In particular, the use of deep learning (DL) techniques based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has obtained promising results in dental applications based on images, in which approaches based on classification, detection, and segmentation are being studied with growing interest. However, there are still several challenges to be tackled, such as the data quality and quantity, the variability among categories, and the analysis of the possible bias and variance associated with each dataset distribution. This study aims to compare the performance of three deep learning object detection models-Faster R-CNN, YOLO V2, and SSD-using different ResNet architectures (ResNet-18, ResNet-50, and ResNet-101) as feature extractors for detecting and classifying third molar angles in panoramic X-rays according to Winter's classification criterion. Each object detection architecture was trained, calibrated, validated, and tested with three different feature extraction CNNs which are ResNet-18, ResNet-50, and ResNet-101, which were the networks that best fit our dataset distribution. Based on such detection networks, we detect four different categories of angles in third molars using panoramic X-rays by using Winter's classification criterion. This criterion characterizes the third molar's position relative to the second molar's longitudinal axis. The detected categories for the third molars are distoangular, vertical, mesioangular, and horizontal. For training, we used a total of 644 panoramic X-rays. The results obtained in the testing dataset reached up to 99% mean average accuracy performance, demonstrating the YOLOV2 obtained higher effectiveness in solving the third molar angle detection problem. These results demonstrate that the use of CNNs for object detection in panoramic radiographs represents a promising solution in dental applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.