ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Development and Assessment of Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Gait Monitoring System Using Single Inertial Sensor.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing geriatric assessment tools for predicting negative health outcomes in older adults.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Parkinson's Disease Detection via Bilateral Gait Camera Sensor Fusion Using CMSA-Net and Implementation on Portable Device.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prediction of Margin of Gait Stability by Using Six-DoF Motion of Pelvis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gait instability is critical in medicine and healthcare, as it has associations with balance disorder and physical impairment. With the development of sensor technology, despite the fact that numerous wearable gait detection and recognition systems have been designed to monitor users' gait patterns, they commonly spend a lot of time and effort to extract gait metrics from signal data. This study aims to design an artificial intelligence-empowered and economic-friendly gait monitoring system. A pair of intelligent shoes with a single inertial sensor and a smartphone application were developed as a gait monitoring system to detect users' gait cycle, stand phase time, swing phase time, stride length, and foot clearance. We recruited 30 participants (24.09 ± 1.89 years) to collect gait data and used the Vicon motion capture system to verify the accuracy of the gait metrics. The results show that the gait monitoring system performs better on the assessment of the gait metrics. The accuracy of stride length and foot clearance is 96.17% and 92.07%, respectively. The artificial intelligence-empowered gait monitoring system holds promising potential for improving gait analysis and monitoring in the medical and healthcare fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.