Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39338683›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Systematic Review of IoT-Based Solutions for User Tracking: Towards Smarter Lifestyle, Wellness and Health Management.

Reza Amini Gougeh, Zeljko Zilic

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Reza Amini GougehFaculty of Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
Zeljko ZilicFaculty of Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6887-3911

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council 21734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) base has grown to over 20 billion devices currently operational worldwide. As they greatly extend the applicability and use of biosensors, IoT developments are transformative. Recent studies show that IoT, coupled with advanced communication frameworks, such as machine-to-machine (M2M) interactions, can lead to (1) improved efficiency in data exchange, (2) accurate and timely health monitoring, and (3) enhanced user engagement and compliance through advancements in human-computer interaction. This systematic review of the 19 most relevant studies examines the potential of IoT in health and lifestyle management by conducting detailed analyses and quality assessments of each study. Findings indicate that IoT-based systems effectively monitor various health parameters using biosensors, facilitate real-time feedback, and support personalized health recommendations. Key limitations include small sample sizes, insufficient security measures, practical issues with wearable sensors, and reliance on internet connectivity in areas with poor network infrastructure. The reviewed studies demonstrated innovative applications of IoT, focusing on M2M interactions, edge devices, multimodality health monitoring, intelligent decision-making, and automated health management systems. These insights offer valuable recommendations for optimizing IoT technologies in health and wellness management.

Indexed as

Internet of ThingsLife StyleBiosensing TechniquesHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicWearable Electronic Deviceshealth and wellness managementhealth monitoringhuman–computer interaction (HCI)Internet of things (IoT)machine-to-machine (M2M) interactionreal-time monitoringwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID39338683
PMCPMC11435569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.