ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Assessment of Low-Cost and Higher-End Soil Moisture Sensors across Various Moisture Ranges and Soil Textures.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Performance Analysis of a U-Shaped Fiber Optic Sensor for Soil Water Content Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Field Performance and Calibration Strategies for Low-Cost Capacitive Soil Moisture Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TerraGrow: Integrated platform for real time plant monitoring and automated watering system with IoT and fuzzy Sugeno Algorithm.HardwareX · 2025Article
- picoSMMS: Development and Validation of a Low-Cost and Open-Source Soil Moisture Monitoring Station.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Moisture Distribution and Ice Front Identification in Freezing Soil Using an Optimized Circular Capacitance Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accuracy and unit cost of sensors are important factors for a continuous soil moisture monitoring system. This study compares the accuracy of four soil moisture sensors differing in unit costs in coarse-, fine-, and medium-textured soils. The sensor outputs were recorded for the VWC, ranging from 0% to 50%. Low-cost capacitive and resistive sensors were evaluated with and without the external 16-bit analog-to-digital converter ADS1115 to improve their performances without adding much cost. Without ADS1115, using only Arduino's built-in analog-to-digital converter, the low-cost sensors had a maximum RMSE of 4.79% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.