Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39338465›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2024

Dose Effect of Polyethylene Microplastics Derived from Commercial Resins on Soil Properties, Bacterial Communities, and Enzymatic Activity.

Lesbia Gicel Cruz, Fo-Ting Shen, Chiou-Pin Chen, Wen-Ching Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lesbia Gicel CruzInternational Master Program in Agriculture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0300-6275
Fo-Ting ShenDepartment of Soil and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-0365
Chiou-Pin ChenThe Experimental Forest, College of Bio-Resources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Nantou County 557004, Taiwan.
Wen-Ching ChenInternational Bachelor Program in Agribusiness, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5010-3361

Funding

National Science and Technology Council MOST 110-2313-B-005-015-
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soils are the largest reservoir of microplastics (MPs) on earth. Since MPs can remain in soils for a very long time, their effects are magnified. In this study, different concentrations of polyethylene (PE) MPs derived from commercial resins (0%, 1%, 7%, and 14%, represented as MP_0, MP_1, MP_7, and MP_14) were added to soils to assess the changes in the soils' chemical properties, enzyme activities, and bacterial communities during a 70-day incubation period. The results show that PE MP treatments with low concentrations differed from other treatments in terms of exchangeable Ca and Mg, whereas at high concentrations, the pH and availability of phosphate ions differed. Fluorescein diacetate (FDA), acid phosphatase (ACP), and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAG) enzyme activities exhibited a dose-related trend with the addition of the PE MPs; however, the average FDA and ACP activities were significantly affected only by MP_14. Changes in the microbial communities were observed at both the phylum and family levels with all PE MP treatments. It was revealed that even a low dosage of PE MPs in soils can affect the functional microbes, and a greater impact is observed on those that can survive in polluted environments with limited resources.

Indexed as

dose–response effectplastic mulchplasticssoil contaminantsoil environmentsoil enzymesoil microbesoil microbial diversitysoil microbial ecologysoil pollutant

Identifiers

PMID39338465
PMCPMC11434124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.