ArticleMicroorganisms2024
Rhizosphere Microbiome Co-Occurrence Network Analysis across a Tomato Domestication Gradient.
Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering soybean-microbiome interactions: from rhizosphere dynamics to sustainable yield enhancement.Plant signaling & behavior · 2026Review
- Strain-Specific Fungal-Bacterial Co-Inoculation Regulates Rhizosphere Microecology and Plant-Soil-Microbiome Responses in Conifer Seedlings.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Network Analysis of Wheat and Couchgrass Rhizobacteria Highlights Candidate Biocontrol Agents for Improved Crop Resilience.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic Divergence and Domestication Jointly Shape the Tomato Root Microbiome.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of wheat straw incorporation and fertilizer reduction on peanut yield and soil functions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Geographic and species-specific determinants of rhizosphere microbiome assembly inISME communications · 2026Article
- Assessing the Divergent Soil Phosphorus Recovery Strategies in Domesticated and Wild Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When plant-available phosphorus (P) is lost from a soil solution, it often accumulates in the soil as a pool of unavailable legacy P. To acquire legacy P, plants employ recovery strategies, such as forming associations with soil microbes. However, the degree to which plants rely on microbial associations for this purpose varies with crop domestication and subsequent breeding. Here, by generating microbial co-occurrence networks, we sought to explore rhizosphere bacterial interactions in low-P conditions and how they change with tomato domestication and breeding. We grew wild tomato, traditional tomato (developed circa 1900), and modern tomato (developed circa 2020) in high-P and low-P soil throughout their vegetative developmental stage. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed that as the tomatoes progressed along the stages of domestication, the rhizosphere microbiome increased in complexity in a P deficit. However, with the addition of P fertilizer, the wild tomato group became more complex, surpassing the complexity of traditional and modern tomato, suggesting a high degree of responsiveness in the rhizosphere microbiome to P fertilizer by wild tomato relatives. By illustrating these changing patterns of network complexity in the tomato rhizosphere microbiome, we can further understand how plant domestication and breeding have shaped plant-microbe interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.