Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39338377›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Complex Diagnostic Challenges in Glioblastoma: The Role of

David Sipos, Zsanett Debreczeni-Máté, Zsombor Ritter, Omar Freihat, Mihály Simon, Árpád Kovács

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Nano-Based Technology in Glioblastoma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David SiposDepartment of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9615-1740
Zsanett Debreczeni-MátéDoctoral School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.
Zsombor RitterDepartment of Medical Imaging, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.
Omar FreihatDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Science, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 59911, United Arab Emirates.
Mihály SimonDepartment of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Árpád KovácsDepartment of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8469-5764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains one of the most aggressive and lethal forms of brain cancer, characterized by rapid proliferation and diffuse infiltration into the surrounding brain tissues. Despite advancements in therapeutic approaches, the prognosis for GBM patients is poor, with median survival times rarely exceeding 15 months post-diagnosis. An accurate diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Core imaging modalities such as Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are indispensable in the initial diagnosis and ongoing management of GBM. Histopathology remains the gold standard for definitive diagnoses, guiding treatment by providing molecular and genetic insights into the tumor. Advanced imaging modalities, particularly positron emission tomography (PET), play a pivotal role in the management of GBM. Among these, 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[

Indexed as

18F-FDOPAdiagnostic imagingglioblastomaMRIPET

Identifiers

PMID39338377
PMCPMC11434841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.