Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39338274›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Overview of Wound Dressing Materials.

Tânia Lagoa, Maria Cristina Queiroga, Luís Martins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recent Applications of Chitosan-Based Biomaterials as Wound Dressings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Mixture Containing 5% Polysaccharide Extract ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tânia LagoaMED-Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Mitra Campus, P.O. Box 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0000-6339-4236
Maria Cristina QueirogaMED-Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Mitra Campus, P.O. Box 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3117-341X
Luís MartinsMED-Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Mitra Campus, P.O. Box 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8848-0384

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/05183/2020 and LA/P/0121/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wounds are an increasing global concern, mainly due to a sedentary lifestyle, frequently associated with the occidental way of life. The current prevalence of obesity in Western societies, leading to an increase in type II diabetes, and an elderly population, is also a key factor associated with the problem of wound healing. Therefore, it stands essential to find wound dressing systems that allow for reestablishing the skin integrity in the shortest possible time and with the lowest cost, avoiding further damage and promoting patients' well-being. Wounds can be classified into acute or chronic, depending essentially on the duration of the healing process, which is associated withextent and depth of the wound, localization, the level of infection, and the patient's health status. For each kind of wound and respective healing stage, there is a more suitable dressing. The aim of this review was to focus on the possible wound dressing management, aiming for a more adequate healing approach for each kind of wound.

Indexed as

biomaterialshealingskinwound dressingswounds

Identifiers

PMID39338274
PMCPMC11434694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.