Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39338237›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Diagnostic Processes and Comprehensive Multimodal Models in Pain Medicine.

Marco Cascella, Matteo L G Leoni, Mohammed Naveed Shariff, Giustino Varrassi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Consciousness Research Through Pain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco CascellaAnesthesia and Pain Medicine, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5236-3132
Matteo L G LeoniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5228-3733
Mohammed Naveed ShariffDepartment of AI&DS, Rajalakshmi Institute of Technology, Chennai 600124, Tamil Nadu, India.
Giustino VarrassiFondazione Paolo Procacci, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3822-2923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain diagnosis remains a challenging task due to its subjective nature, the variability in pain expression among individuals, and the difficult assessment of the underlying biopsychosocial factors. In this complex scenario, artificial intelligence (AI) can offer the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, predict treatment outcomes, and personalize pain management strategies. This review aims to dissect the current literature on computer-aided diagnosis methods. It also discusses how AI-driven diagnostic strategies can be integrated into multimodal models that combine various data sources, such as facial expression analysis, neuroimaging, and physiological signals, with advanced AI techniques. Despite the significant advancements in AI technology, its widespread adoption in clinical settings faces crucial challenges. The main issues are ethical considerations related to patient privacy, biases, and the lack of reliability and generalizability. Furthermore, there is a need for high-quality real-world validation and the development of standardized protocols and policies to guide the implementation of these technologies in diverse clinical settings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomatic pain assessmentpainpain diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39338237
PMCPMC11432921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.