ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024
Cheminformatic Identification of Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase 1 (Tdp1) Inhibitors: A Comparative Study of SMILES-Based Supervised Machine Learning Models.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-throughput identification of bacterial β-glucuronidase inhibitors using machine learning.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Interpretable Small-Sample Deep Learning with Approximate Attribution Enhancement for Atomically Precise Gold Nanoclusters Synthesis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (Tdp1) repairs damages in DNA induced by abortive topoisomerase 1 activity; however, maintenance of genetic integrity may sustain cellular division of neoplastic cells. It follows that Tdp1-targeting chemical inhibitors could synergize well with existing chemotherapy drugs to deny cancer growth; therefore, identification of Tdp1 inhibitors may advance precision medicine in oncology.
objectiveCurrent computational research efforts focus primarily on molecular docking simulations, though datasets involving three-dimensional molecular structures are often hard to curate and computationally expensive to store and process. We propose the use of simplified molecular input line entry system (SMILES) chemical representations to train supervised machine learning (ML) models, aiming to predict potential Tdp1 inhibitors.
methodsAn open-sourced consensus dataset containing the inhibitory activity of numerous chemicals against Tdp1 was obtained from Kaggle. Various ML algorithms were trained, ranging from simple algorithms to ensemble methods and deep neural networks. For algorithms requiring numerical data, SMILES were converted to chemical descriptors using RDKit, an open-sourced Python cheminformatics library.
resultsOut of 13 optimized ML models with rigorously tuned hyperparameters, the random forest model gave the best results, yielding a receiver operating characteristics-area under curve of 0.7421, testing accuracy of 0.6815, sensitivity of 0.6444, specificity of 0.7156, precision of 0.6753, and F1 score of 0.6595.
conclusionsEnsemble methods, especially the bootstrap aggregation mechanism adopted by random forest, outperformed other ML algorithms in classifying Tdp1 inhibitors from non-inhibitors using SMILES. The discovery of Tdp1 inhibitors could unlock more treatment regimens for cancer patients, allowing for therapies tailored to the patient's condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.