Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39338066›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Racial Attitudes and Perceptions of Government Response during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Public Health Strategies.

Man Hung, Jeremy D Franklin, William A Smith, Carlos J Crespo, Evelyn U Ezikwelu, Jerry Bounsanga, Martin S Lipsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Man HungCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2827-3740
Jeremy D FranklinUniversity of Utah Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
William A SmithCollege of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7941-2942
Carlos J CrespoCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-4038-5812
Evelyn U EzikweluCollege of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Jerry BounsangaCollege of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Martin S LipskyCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study explored whether opinions about the government's role in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic vary based on demographic characteristics and racial beliefs. We hypothesized that opinions about the United States (U.S.) government's response to COVID-19 would differ based on an individual's characteristics such as age, race, and racial beliefs.

methodsWe utilized an Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research dataset to examine differences in opinion regarding the government's pandemic response, considering personal characteristics and racial beliefs. Descriptive statistics depicted respondents' characteristics, and a Chi-square test for independence assessed whether differences emerged based on racial attitude, self-reported racial identity, sex, income, education, and age. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to independently determine which characteristics were associated with differences in evaluating the government's pandemic response.

resultsThe sample consisted of 1028 respondents: 47.5% male and 52.5% female. Overall, the group viewed the government unfavorably, with only 40% reporting that the government responded correctly and 54% believing the government is almost always wasteful and inefficient. Hispanics or Latinos were more likely to view the government as wasteful or inefficient, while more Whites rated the government's pandemic response as appropriate. Individuals who believed that racial discrimination is the main reason why many Black people cannot get ahead generally regarded the government's pandemic response more favorably. Only 5% deemed the government's response excessive. Being Black, younger, and female was associated with the view that racial discrimination is the main reason why many Black people cannot get ahead. Individuals who felt this way viewed the government unfavorably by almost a 2:1 ratio.

conclusionsA majority of U.S. residents do not believe the government responded correctly to the pandemic and more than half viewed the government as wasteful and inefficient. Differences emerged by ethnicity and racial attitudes, with individuals of color holding more negative views of the government's response. Understanding this perspective can help develop messaging and strategies that resonate with communities where racial and minority groups live.

Indexed as

COVID-19GovernmentRacial GroupsAdolescentAdultAgedAttitudeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPublic HealthUnited StatesYoung AdultCOVID-19disparitieseconomicsminoritiespandemicpoliticsracial inequality

Identifiers

PMID39338066
PMCPMC11431073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.