ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024
Deep Learning-Based Obesity Identification System for Young Adults Using Smartphone Inertial Measurements.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optical Sensor-Based Approaches in Obesity Detection: A Literature Review of Gait Analysis, Pose Estimation, and Human Voxel Modeling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obesity recognition in adolescents is a growing concern. This study presents a deep learning-based obesity identification framework that integrates smartphone inertial measurements with deep learning models to address this issue. Utilizing data from accelerometers, gyroscopes, and rotation vectors collected via a mobile health application, we analyzed gait patterns for obesity indicators. Our framework employs three deep learning models: convolutional neural networks (CNNs), long-short-term memory network (LSTM), and a hybrid CNN-LSTM model. Trained on data from 138 subjects, including both normal and obese individuals, and tested on an additional 35 subjects, the hybrid model achieved the highest accuracy of 97%, followed by the LSTM model at 96.31% and the CNN model at 95.81%. Despite the promising outcomes, the study has limitations, such as a small sample and the exclusion of individuals with distorted gait. In future work, we aim to develop more generalized models that accommodate a broader range of gait patterns, including those with medical conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.