Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39337990›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Practical Use of Ultrasound in Modern Rheumatology-From A to Z.

Tanya Sapundzhieva, Lyubomir Sapundzhiev, Anastas Batalov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanya SapundzhievaDepartment of Propedeutics of Internal Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4001 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-2061-6473
Lyubomir SapundzhievDepartment of Propedeutics of Internal Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4001 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-7198-3532
Anastas BatalovDepartment of Propedeutics of Internal Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4001 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-8857-0574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past 20 years, the use of ultrasound (US) in rheumatology has increased tremendously, and has become a valuable tool in rheumatologists' hands, not only for assessment of musculoskeletal structures like joints and peri-articular tissues, but also for evaluation of nerves, vessels, lungs, and skin, as well as for increasing the accuracy in a number of US-guided aspirations and injections. The US is currently used as the imaging method of choice for establishing an early diagnosis, assessing disease activity, monitoring treatment efficacy, and assessing the remission state of inflammatory joint diseases. It is also used as a complementary tool for the assessment of patients with degenerative joint diseases like osteoarthritis, and in the detection of crystal deposits for establishing the diagnosis of metabolic arthropathies (gout, calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease). The US has an added value in the diagnostic process of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis, and is currently included in the classification criteria. A novel use of US in the assessment of the skin and lung involvement in connective tissue diseases has the potential to replace more expensive and risky imaging modalities. This narrative review will take a close look at the most recent evidence-based data regarding the use of US in the big spectrum of rheumatic diseases.

Indexed as

imagingmusculoskeletalrheumatologyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39337990
PMCPMC11433054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.