Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39337961›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Experimental Method for Identifying Regions of Use of a Progressive Power Lens Using an Eye-Tracker: Validation Study.

Clara Benedi-Garcia, Pablo Concepcion-Grande, Eva Chamorro, Jose Miguel Cleva, José Alonso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clara Benedi-GarciaClinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, 28002 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9361-4137
Pablo Concepcion-GrandeClinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, 28002 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4262-0606
Eva ChamorroClinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, 28002 Madrid, Spain.
Jose Miguel ClevaClinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, 28002 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2908-6616
José AlonsoClinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, 28002 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Power distribution of progressive power lenses provides usable regions based on power distribution analysis. However, recent studies demonstrated that these regions are not always used for certain tasks as predicted. This work determines the concordance between the actual region of lens use and compares it with the theoretically located regions. The pupil position of 26 subjects was recorded using an eye-tracking system (Tobii-Pro-Glasses 3) at distance and near-reading tasks while wearing a general use progressive power lens. Subjects were asked to read aloud a text showed on a screen placed at 5.25 m and 37 cm while looking though the central and lateral regions of the lens. The pupil position was projected onto the back surface of the lens to obtain the actual region of use for each fixation. Results showed that the actual region of use matched with the theoretically located. On average, the concordance between the actual and theoretical regions of use was 85% for a distance-reading task and 73% for a near-reading task. In conclusion, the proposed method effectively located the actual regions of the lens used, revealing how users' posture affects lens usage. This insight enables the design of more customized progressive lenses based on the areas used during vision-based tasks.

Indexed as

eye-trackingprogressive power lensespupil positionregions of use

Identifiers

PMID39337961
PMCPMC11433045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.