Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39337874›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Clinical Examination, Diagnosis, and Conservative Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.

Paulien Custers, Erik Van de Kelft, Bart Eeckhaut, Wouter Sabbe, An Hofman, Annick Debuysscher, Gilles Van Acker, Gaethan Maes

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07178548 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Assessing Compliance With Low Back Pain Treatment Guidelines: Attitudes of Physiotherapists and Internship Students

TypeobservationalSponsorMedipol UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled106ConditionsLow Back Pain, Guideline Adherence, Physiotherapist, Physiotherapist StudentsArmsOnline Survey
NCT07610044 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises and Swiss Ball Exercises in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LahoreRan2025 to 2026Enrolled69ConditionsNon-specific Chronic Low Back PainArmsBaseline Physiotherapy, Swiss Ball Exercises, Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises
NCT07645859 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of High-Intensity Interval Training With Moderate-Intensity Connuous Training In Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDow University of Health SciencesRan2026 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsChronic Non-Specific Low Back PainArmsBrisk walk and jog, Normal walk
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paulien CustersDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Erik Van de KelftDepartment of Neurosurgery, VITAZ, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Bart EeckhautDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VITAZ, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Wouter SabbeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VITAZ, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
An HofmanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VITAZ, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Annick DebuysscherDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VITAZ, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Gilles Van AckerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VITAZ, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Gaethan MaesDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VITAZ, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain is one of the most frequent reasons for medical consultation. It is important to make the correct diagnosis to select the most appropriate treatment in a stepwise approach. In this narrative review, we focus on the clinical examination, the diagnosis, and the conservative treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain. Belgian guidelines for low back pain were used as a basis, followed by a snowball search starting from two articles. Besides that, the Cochrane database was consulted using the following research areas: "multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation", "physical examination of lumbar spine", and "rehabilitation back pain". Lastly, we took information from three handbooks. The diagnosis of low back pain starts with a thorough history, including red, yellow, orange, black, and blue flags. Physical, neurological, sensory, and motor testing is performed and complemented with specific tests for low back pain. With a focus on the conservative treatment, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are possible. For CNSLBP, conservative management is advised, starting with reassurance and clear patient education about the condition. While additional treatments, such as manipulation, massage, and acupuncture, can be considered, their effectiveness is not well supported by evidence. Our center emphasizes exercise within a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation program, and although evidence for this approach is limited, we have seen positive outcomes, including improved mobility, strength, and higher return-to-work rates, particularly with the David Spine Concept (DSC).

Indexed as

chronic non-specific low back painCNSLBPconservative treatmentlow back pain

Identifiers

PMID39337874
PMCPMC11433180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.