ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Clinical Outcomes of Angiotensin II Therapy in Vasoplegic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An overview of reviews of Angiotensin II in distributive shock.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Septic Cardiomyopathy: Age-Dependent Physiology and Hemodynamic Aspects-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Endothelial soluble guanylate cyclase enzyme inhibitors as a novel target for the treatment of sepsis-related hypotension.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Higher circulating ACE2 and DPP3 but reduced ACE and angiotensinogen in hyperreninemic sepsis patients.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAngiotensin II is a peptide hormone vasopressor that activates angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors leading to vasoconstriction, the augmentation of arterial blood pressure (ABP), and organ perfusion. Angiotensin II was found to increase the ABP in catecholamine-refractory vasodilatory shock. Whether this effect improves the chances of survival or not remains inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of angiotensin II in vasoplegic shock.
objectivesTo evaluate the clinical significance of angiotensin II effects in vasoplegic shock concerning the hemodynamic impact, mortality outcomes, and side effects.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed and EMBASE for experimental and observational studies published in English exploring the clinical outcomes of angiotensin II use in vasodilatory shock till 1 July 2024. Two independent authors assessed the quality and risk of bias of the included studies. A random effect model (Mantel-Haenszel) was used to combine data. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality associated with angiotensin II use in comparison to standard therapy, while the secondary outcomes were mean arterial pressure (MAP) change, multi-organ failure (MOF), and the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The Q test and I
resultsA total of eight studies (
conclusionsIn vasodilatory shock, angiotensin II use demonstrated comparable in-hospital mortality compared to standard therapy. Nevertheless, it resulted in significant MAP change, which may encourage clinicians to use it in cases of profound hypotension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.