ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Distinct Genomic Expression Signatures after Low-Force Electrically Induced Exercises in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Omics Applications for Intervention Monitoring in Spinal Cord Injury.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Review
- Special Issue "Molecular Insights into the Role of Exercise in Disease and Health".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with a spinal cord injury are at an increased risk of metabolic dysfunction due to skeletal muscle atrophy and the transition of paralyzed muscle to a glycolytic, insulin-resistant phenotype. Providing doses of exercise through electrical muscle stimulation may provide a therapeutic intervention to help restore metabolic function for people with a spinal cord injury, but high-frequency and high-force electrically induced muscle contractions increase fracture risk for the underlying osteoporotic skeletal system. Therefore, we investigated the acute molecular responses after a session of either a 3 Hz or 1 Hz electrically induced exercise program. Ten people with a complete spinal cord injury completed a 1 h (3 Hz) or 3 h (1 Hz) unilateral electrically induced exercise session prior to a skeletal muscle biopsy of the vastus lateralis. The number of pulses was held constant. Tissue samples were analyzed for genomic and epigenomic expression profiles. There was a strong acute response after the 3 Hz exercise leading to the upregulation of early response genes (NR4A3, PGC-1α, ABRA, IRS2, EGR1, ANKRD1, and MYC), which have prominent roles in regulating molecular pathways that control mitochondrial biogenesis, contractile protein synthesis, and metabolism. Additionally, these genes, and others, contributed to the enrichment of pathways associated with signal transduction, cellular response to stimuli, gene expression, and metabolism. While there were similar trends observed after the 1 Hz exercise, the magnitude of gene expression changes did not reach our significance thresholds, despite a constant number of stimuli delivered. There were also no robust acute changes in muscle methylation after either form of exercise. Taken together, this study supports that a dose of low-force electrically induced exercise for 1 h using a 3 Hz stimulation frequency is suitable to trigger an acute genomic response in people with chronic paralysis, consistent with an expression signature thought to improve the metabolic and contractile phenotype of paralyzed muscle, if performed on a regular basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.