ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Network Analysis of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions Highlights Cell-Type-Specific Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation Variation.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression is orchestrated by a complex array of gene regulatory elements that govern transcription in a cell-type-specific manner. Though previously studied, the ability to utilize regulatory elements to identify disrupting variants remains largely elusive. To identify important factors within these regions, we generated enhancer-promoter interaction (EPI) networks and investigated the presence of disease-associated variants that fall within these regions. Our study analyzed six neuronal cell types across neural differentiation, allowing us to examine closely related cell types and across differentiation stages. Our results expand upon previous findings of cell-type specificity of enhancer, promoter, and transcription factor binding sites. Notably, we find that regulatory regions within EPI networks can identify the enrichment of variants associated with neuropsychiatric disorders within specific cell types and network sub-structures. This enrichment within sub-structures can allow for a better understanding of potential mechanisms by which variants may disrupt transcription. Together, our findings suggest that EPIs can be leveraged to better understand cell-type-specific regulatory architecture and used as a selection method for disease-associated variants to be tested in future functional assays. Combined with these future functional characterization assays, EPIs can be used to better identify and characterize regulatory variants' effects on such networks and model their mechanisms of gene regulation disruption across different disorders. Such findings can be applied in practical settings, such as diagnostic tools and drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.