Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39337242›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessing Patient Satisfaction and the Need for Collaborative Treatment with Korean and Western Medicine.

Soyong Park, Yoonju Lee, Linae Kim, Shiva Raj Acharya, NamKwen Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soyong ParkCollege of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0008-8308-0523
Yoonju LeeCollege of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0002-8542-8171
Linae KimResearch Institute for Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0006-6888-4203
Shiva Raj AcharyaResearch Institute for Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6902-4436
NamKwen KimCollege of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6969-1231

Funding

Operation Support Program for the Monitoring Center for Korean Medicine and Western Medicine Collaboration of the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea 202400130001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe collaborative treatment of Korean medicine (KM) and Western medicine (WM) in Korea has gained prominence since its initiation. However, comprehensive evaluations of patient satisfaction and care effectiveness remain limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and the need for collaborative KM-WM treatment in the fourth phase of the national pilot project.

methodsA multicenter survey was conducted among 321 patients from 15 institutions participating in the fourth phase of the collaborative KM-WM pilot project, spanning from 1 August 2023 to 31 October 2023. Patient satisfaction and needs were assessed using a validated, semi-structured questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical multiple regression were used in the analysis.

resultsThe overall satisfaction with collaborative KM-WM treatment was notably high (91.25%). Among the participants, 91.58% indicated the necessity of the collaborative KM-WM pilot project, whereas 90.66% pointed out the need to incorporate inpatient services into collaborative care. Expansion of the pilot project to additional institutions and primary healthcare settings was substantially demanded (85.36% and 80.06%, respectively). Treatment effects (

conclusionsThe fourth phase of the KM-WM project reflects high patient satisfaction and a substantial need for collaborative treatment. Further research should include longitudinal studies and employ mixed-methods approaches to better understand, evaluate, and improve collaborative KM-WM treatment.

Indexed as

collaborative treatmentKorean medicinepatient satisfactionWestern medicine

Identifiers

PMID39337242
PMCPMC11431174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.