Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336999›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Update on Clinical Trial Endpoints in Gene Therapy Trials for Inherited Retinal Diseases.

Jane M Igoe, Byron L Lam, Ninel Z Gregori

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical endpoints special session, ISCEV 2025, Utrecht.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Novel Therapies for Inherited Retinal Dystrophies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  19. Nano Approaches to Nucleic Acid Delivery: Barriers, Solutions, and Current Landscape.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jane M IgoeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-0106-7137
Byron L LamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Ninel Z GregoriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) encompass a wide spectrum of rare conditions characterized by diverse phenotypes associated with hundreds of genetic variations, often leading to progressive visual impairment and profound vision loss. Multiple natural history studies and clinical trials exploring gene therapy for various IRDs are ongoing. Outcomes for ophthalmic trials measure visual changes in three main categories-structural, functional, and patient-focused outcomes. Since IRDs may range from congenital with poor central vision from birth to affecting the peripheral retina initially and progressing insidiously with visual acuity affected late in the disease course, typical outcome measures such as central visual acuity and ocular coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the macula may not provide adequate representation of therapeutic outcomes including alterations in disease course. Thus, alternative unique outcome measures are necessary to assess loss of peripheral vision, color vision, night vision, and contrast sensitivity in IRDs. These differences have complicated the assessment of clinical outcomes for IRD therapies, and the clinical trials for IRDs have had to design novel specialized endpoints to demonstrate treatment efficacy. As genetic engineering and gene therapy techniques continue to advance with growing investment from industry and accelerated approval tracks for orphan conditions, the clinical trials must continue to improve their assessments to demonstrate safety and efficacy of new gene therapies that aim to come to market. Here, we will provide an overview of the current gene therapy approaches, review various endpoints for measuring visual function, highlight those that are utilized in recent gene therapy trials, and provide an overview of stage 2 and 3 IRD trials through the second quarter of 2024.

Indexed as

clinical trialsefficacyendpointgene therapyhereditary retinal degenerationinherited retinal degenerationinherited retinal diseaseinherited retinal dystrophyoutcome measures

Identifiers

PMID39336999
PMCPMC11431936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.