ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assistance in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Short-Term Outcomes.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07149714 (Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support With the iVAC 2L Transaortic Device in High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support With the iVAC 2L Transaortic Device in High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical Circulatory Support with iVAC2L During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Vascular access options for complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary interventions: contemporary strategies, trade-offs, and practical algorithms.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiogenic Shock Management in the Modern Era: A Narrative Review of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- First evaluation of a novel pulsatile LVAD: Feasibility and haemodynamic impact in acute heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Sheathless delivery of a transfemoral pulsatile left ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous interventions: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical and Preclinical Evidence on a Novel Percutaneous Pulsatile Ventricular Assist Device (PulseCath): Protocol for a Scoping Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Brazil's First High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Hemodynamic Support from a Percutaneous Pulsatile Device: A Case Report.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo document the real-world experience with the use of pneumatic pulsatile mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with the PulseCath iVAC2L during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCIs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.