Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336827›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

Revision of the Most Primitive Taxa of the Family Gyrodactylidae (van Beneden et Hesse, 1864) (Platyhelminthes, Monopisthocotyla) Based on ITS rDNA Phylogeny.

Jakub Janulewicz, Maciej Pietkiewicz, Marek S Ziętara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Complete Mitochondrial Genome ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Preclinical Evaluation of Fenbendazole for ControllingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jakub JanulewiczLaboratory of Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.
Maciej PietkiewiczLaboratory of Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0009-0007-1046-7754
Marek S ZiętaraLaboratory of Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0871-7076

Funding

University of Gdańsk 531-D200-D895-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor the past 25 years, the ITS rDNA (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) of Gyrodactylidae has been crucial for species identification, description, and phylogeny. This family includes 25 genera parasitizing marine and freshwater fish, initially distinguished by morphological differences in attachment and/or male copulatory organs.

methodsA phylogeny based on ITS rDNA was proposed to address these challenges, using only complete sequences of primitive taxa. Fifty-four sequences were aligned with the MUSCLE v5.1 algorithm, creating a 1590 ps long matrix. Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods with the models TVM+F+G4 and SYM+G4 for ITS1-ITS2 and 5.8S, respectively, were inferred using IQ-TREE v2.3.5 and BEAST v2.7.6.0.

resultsThe findings revealed eleven main lineages. Four of them are proposed for classification into new genera:

conclusionsThe presented phylogeny provides a foundation for developing a classification system within Gyrodactylidae that is both reasonable and comprehensive.

Indexed as

PhylogenyPlatyhelminthsAnimalsBayes TheoremDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFishesDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerCichlidarus gen. nov.GyrodactylidaeIraqemembranatus gen. nov.ITS rDNAMacracanthus gen. nov.molecular phylogenyPlatyhelminthesRysavyius gen. nov

Identifiers

PMID39336827
PMCPMC11430952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.