ArticleGenes2024
Developing a Machine Learning 'Smart' Polymerase Chain Reaction Thermocycler Part 2: Putting the Theoretical Framework into Practice.
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of PCR into forensic science and the rapid increases in the sensitivity, specificity and discrimination power of DNA profiling that followed have been fundamental in shaping the field of forensic biology. Despite these developments, the challenges associated with the DNA profiling of trace, inhibited and degraded samples remain. Thus, any improvement to the performance of sub-optimal samples in DNA profiling would be of great value to the forensic community. The potential exists to optimise the PCR performance of samples by altering the cycling conditions used. If the effects of changing cycling conditions upon the quality of a DNA profile can be well understood, then the PCR process can be manipulated to achieve a specific goal. This work is a proof-of-concept study for the development of a smart PCR system, the theoretical foundations of which are outlined in part 1 of this publication. The first steps needed to demonstrate the performance of our smart PCR goal involved the manual alteration of cycling conditions and assessment of the DNA profiles produced. In this study, the timing and temperature of the denaturation and annealing stages of the PCR were manually altered to achieve the goal of reducing PCR runtime while maintaining an acceptable quality and quantity of DNA product. A real-time feedback system was also trialled using an STR PCR and qPCR reaction mix, and the DNA profiles generated were compared to profiles produced using the standard STR PCR kits. The aim of this work was to leverage machine learning to enable real-time adjustments during a PCR, allowing optimisation of cycling conditions towards predefined user goals. A set of parameters was found that yielded similar results to the standard endpoint PCR methodology but was completed 30 min faster. The development of an intelligent system would have significant implications for the various biological disciplines that are reliant on PCR technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.