Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336787›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

Developing a Machine-Learning 'Smart' PCR Thermocycler, Part 1: Construction of a Theoretical Framework.

Caitlin McDonald, Duncan Taylor, Gershom Mwachari Masawi, Ayesha Khalid Ahmed Khan, Richard Leibbrandt, Adrian Linacre, Russell S A Brinkworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caitlin McDonaldCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-2372-0564
Duncan TaylorCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0633-7424
Gershom Mwachari MasawiCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Ayesha Khalid Ahmed KhanCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Richard LeibbrandtCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Adrian LinacreCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Russell S A BrinkworthCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0270-3538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of PCR is widespread in biological fields. Some fields, such as forensic biology, push PCR to its limits as DNA profiling may be required in short timeframes, may be produced from minute amounts of starting material, and may be required to perform in the presence of inhibitory compounds. Due to the extreme high-throughput of samples using PCR in forensic science, any small improvement in the ability of PCR to address these challenges can have dramatic effects for the community. At least part of the improvement in PCR performance could potentially come by altering PCR cycling conditions. These alterations could be general, in that they are applied to all samples, or they could be tailored to individual samples for maximum targeted effect. Further to this, there may be the ability to respond in real time to the conditions of PCR for a sample and make cycling parameters change on the fly. Such a goal would require both a means to track the conditions of the PCR in real time, and the knowledge of how cycling parameters should be altered, given the current conditions. In Part 1 of our work, we carry out the theoretical groundwork for the ambitious goal of creating a smart PCR system that can respond appropriately to features within individual samples in real time. We approach this task using an open qPCR instrument to provide real-time feedback and machine learning to identify what a successful PCR 'looks like' at different stages of the process. We describe the fundamental steps to set up a real-time feedback system, devise a method of controlling PCR cycling conditions from cycle to cycle, and to develop a system of defining PCR goals, scoring the performance of the system towards achieving those goals. We then present three proof-of-concept studies that prove the feasibility of this overall method. In a later Part 2 of our work, we demonstrate the performance of the theory outlined in this paper on a large-scale PCR cycling condition alteration experiment. The aim is to utilise machine learning so that throughout the process of PCR automatic adjustments can be made to best alter cycling conditions towards a user-defined goal. The realisation of smart PCR systems will have large-scale ramifications for biological fields that utilise PCR.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPolymerase Chain ReactionHumanscycling conditionsmachine learningPCR thermocyclerSTR DNA profile

Identifiers

PMID39336787
PMCPMC11431463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.