ReviewGenes2024
Applications and Performance of Precision ID GlobalFiler NGS STR, Identity, and Ancestry Panels in Forensic Genetics.
Review in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Implications of uniparental disomy in forensic kinship testing: A case study of paternal isodisomy on chromosome 3.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
- The potential of mRNA markers in body fluids and personal source analysis based on the QNome nanopore sequencing.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Forensic utilization of NGS-STRs and evaluation of system efficacy for different kinship identifications.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an MPS-based 513-Plex SNP identity panel for degraded forensic samples.Human genetics · 2025Article
- Implementation of NGS and SNP microarrays in routine forensic practice: opportunities and barriers.BMC genomics · 2025Review
- Prediction of Skin Color Using Forensic DNA Phenotyping in Asian Populations: A Focus on Thailand.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short Tandem Repeat (STR) testing via capillary electrophoresis is undoubtedly the most popular forensic genetic testing method. However, its low multiplexing capabilities and limited performance with challenging samples are among the factors pushing scientists towards new technologies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods overcome some of these limitations while also enabling the testing of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). Nonetheless, these methods are still under optimization, and their adoption into practice is limited. Among the available kits, Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) produces three Precision ID Panels: GlobalFiler NGS STR, Identity, and Ancestry. A clear review of these kits, providing information useful for the promotion of their use, is, however, lacking. To close the gap, a literature review was performed to investigate the popularity, applications, and performance of these kits. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 89 publications produced since 2015 were identified. China was the most active country in the field, and the Identity Panel was the most researched. All kits appeared robust and useful for low-quality and low-quantity samples, while performance with mixtures varied. The need for more population data was highlighted, as well as further research surrounding variables affecting the quality of the sequencing results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.