ReviewInsects2024
Advancements and Future Prospects of CRISPR-Cas-Based Population Replacement Strategies in Insect Pest Management.
Review in Insects, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Pest Management Strategies in Phytoplasma Insect Vectors Control.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Harnessing CRISPR-Cas technology for insect pest control: current advances and future perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Integrated Pest Management Strategies for ControllingInsects · 2026Review
- Research Progress on Sex Pheromone Receptors in Insects.Insects · 2026Review
- Exploring the Role of Pheromones and CRISPR/Cas9 in the Behavioral and Olfactory Mechanisms ofInsects · 2025Review
- Ribosomal RNA-Specific Antisense DNA and Double-Stranded DNA Trigger rRNA Biogenesis and Insecticidal Effects on the Insect PestInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Insect Pest Control from Chemical to Biotechnological Approach: Constrains and Challenges.Insects · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population replacement refers to the process by which a wild-type population of insect pests is replaced by a population possessing modified traits or abilities. Effective population replacement necessitates a gene drive system capable of spreading desired genes within natural populations, operating under principles akin to super-Mendelian inheritance. Consequently, releasing a small number of genetically edited insects could potentially achieve population control objectives. Currently, several gene drive approaches are under exploration, including the newly adapted CRISPR-Cas genome editing system. Multiple studies are investigating methods to engineer pests that are incapable of causing crop damage or transmitting vector-borne diseases, with several notable successful examples documented. This review summarizes the recent advancements of the CRISPR-Cas system in the realm of population replacement and provides insights into research methodologies, testing protocols, and implementation strategies for gene drive techniques. The review also discusses emerging trends and prospects for establishing genetic tools in pest management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.