ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024
Current Challenges in Coronary Bifurcation Interventions.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a predictive model for side branch flow impairment following stent implantation in patients with non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions: a retrospective analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Diagnosis and Revascularization Guidance of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- From association to causation: Integrating stable, subgroup-aware SHAP explanations with causal inference for trustworthy AI in coronary bifurcation PCI.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Challenges and Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Double-Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Coronary Bifurcations: A 1-Year Follow-up Study in Vietnam.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary bifurcation lesions account for a significant proportion of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Interventional treatment of coronary bifurcations is related to significant technical challenges, high complication rates, and worse angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes. This review covers the specific features and structure of coronary bifurcation and explores the main challenges in the interventional treatment of these lesions. This review evaluates various methodologies designed to address these lesions, considering factors such as plaque distribution and bifurcation geometry. It also emphasizes the limitations associated with current techniques. A novel combined optimization approach applied in the interventional treatment of coronary bifurcation may offer superior procedural and long-term outcomes. This combined technique could potentially address the drawbacks of each method, providing a more effective solution for optimizing stent placement in bifurcation lesions. Refining and evaluating these combined techniques is essential for improving clinical outcomes in patients with bifurcation lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.