ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Bond Strength between Steel Rebars and Concrete Using Bayesian Optimization.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to estimate the bond strength between steel rebars and concrete using machine learning (ML) algorithms with Bayesian optimization (BO). It is important to conduct beam tests to determine the bond strength since it is affected by stress fields. A machine learning approach for bond strength based on 401 beam tests with six impact factors is presented in this paper. The model is composed of three standard algorithms, including random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), combined with the BO technique. Compared to empirical models, BO-XGB`oost was found to be the most accurate method, with values of R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.