Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336350›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Utilization of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration (MSWIFA) in Geopolymer Concrete: A Study on Compressive Strength and Leaching Characteristics.

Qiyong Xu, Ning Shang, Jae Hac Ko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiyong XuShenzhen Engineering Laboratory for Eco-Efficient Recycled Materials, School of Environment and Energy, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, University Town, Xili, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9396-9958
Ning ShangShenzhen Engineering Laboratory for Eco-Efficient Recycled Materials, School of Environment and Energy, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, University Town, Xili, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Jae Hac KoDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju-si 63243, Jeju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the utilization of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWIFA) in geopolymer concrete, focusing on compressive strength and heavy metal leachability. MSWIFA was sourced from a Shenzhen waste incineration plant and pretreated by washing to remove soluble salts. Geopolymer concrete was prepared incorporate with washed or unwashed MSWIFA and tested under different pH conditions (2.88, 4.20, and 10.0). Optimal compressive strength was achieved with a Si/Al ratio of 1.5, water/Na ratio of 10, and sand-binder ratio of 0.6. The washing pretreatment significantly enhanced compressive strength, particularly under alkaline conditions, with GP-WFA (washed MSWIFA) exhibiting a 49.6% increase in compressive strength, compared to a 21.3% increase in GP-FA (unwashed MSWIFA). Additionally, GP-WFA's compressive strength reached 41.7 MPa, comparable to that of the control (GP-control) at 43.7 MPa. Leaching tests showed that acidic conditions (pH 2.88) promoted heavy metal leaching, which increased over the leaching time, while an alkaline environment significantly reduced the leachability of heavy metals. These findings highlight the potential of using washed MSWIFA in geopolymer concrete, promoting sustainable construction practices, particularly in alkaline conditions.

Indexed as

compressive strengthgeopolymerheavy metal leachabilitymunicipal solid waste incineration fly ashwashing pretreatment

Identifiers

PMID39336350
PMCPMC11433083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.