Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336274›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Predicting High-Strength Concrete's Compressive Strength: A Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Networks, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System, and Response Surface Methodology.

Tianlong Li, Jianyu Yang, Pengxiao Jiang, Ali H AlAteah, Ali Alsubeai, Abdulgafor M Alfares, Muhammad Sufian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tianlong LiSchool of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
Jianyu YangSchool of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China.
Pengxiao JiangChina Construction Fifth Engineering Division Corp., Ltd., Changsha 410000, China.
Ali H AlAteahDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin 39524, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1383-9003
Ali AlsubeaiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jubail Industrial College, Royal Commission of Jubail, Jubail Industrial City 31961, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulgafor M AlfaresDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin 39524, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2333-4890
Muhammad SufianSchool of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6777-0219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning and response surface methods for predicting the compressive strength of high-strength concrete have not been adequately compared. Therefore, this research aimed to predict the compressive strength of high-strength concrete (HSC) using different methods. To achieve this purpose, neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and response surface methodology (RSM) were used as ensemble methods. Using an ANN and ANFIS, high-strength concrete (HSC) output was modeled and optimized as a function of five independent variables. The RSM was designed with three input variables: cement, and fine and coarse aggregate. To facilitate data entry into Design Expert, the RSM model was divided into six groups, with

Indexed as

artificial neural networkscentral composite designcompressive strengthhigh-strength concreteneuro-fuzzy inference systemssensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID39336274
PMCPMC11432809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.