ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Performance of Low-Dimensional Solid Room-Temperature Photodetectors-Critical View.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Architectures and Emerging Materials for High-Operating-Temperature Infrared Photodiodes.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Peculiarities of room temperature organic photodetectors.Light, science & applications · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the last twenty years, nanofabrication progress has allowed for the emergence of a new photodetector family, generally called low-dimensional solids (LDSs), among which the most important are two-dimensional (2D) materials, perovskites, and nanowires/quantum dots. They operate in a wide wavelength range from ultraviolet to far-infrared. Current research indicates remarkable advances in increasing the performance of this new generation of photodetectors. The published performance at room temperature is even better than reported for typical photodetectors. Several articles demonstrate detectivity outperforming physical boundaries driven by background radiation and signal fluctuations. This study attempts to explain these peculiarities. In order to achieve this goal, we first clarify the fundamental differences in the photoelectric effects of the new generation of photodetectors compared to the standard designs dominating the commercial market. Photodetectors made of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), quantum dots, topological insulators, and perovskites are mainly considered. Their performance is compared with the fundamental limits estimated by the signal fluctuation limit (in the ultraviolet region) and the background radiation limit (in the infrared region). In the latter case, Law 19 dedicated to HgCdTe photodiodes is used as a standard reference benchmark. The causes for the performance overestimate of the different types of LDS detectors are also explained. Finally, an attempt is made to determine their place in the global market in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.