ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Analysis of the Current State of Research on Bio-Healing Concrete (Bioconcrete).
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction Biotechnology: Integrating Bacterial Systems into Civil Engineering Practices.Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relatively small tensile strength of concrete makes this material particularly vulnerable to cracking. However, the reality is that it is not always possible and practically useful to conduct studies on high-quality sealing cracks due to their inaccessibility or small opening width. Despite the fact that currently there are many technologies for creating self-healing cement composites, one of the most popular is the technology for creating a biologically active self-healing mechanism for concrete. It is based on the process of carbonate ion production by cellular respiration or urease enzymes by bacteria, which results in the precipitation of calcium carbonate in concrete. This technology is environmentally friendly and promising from a scientific and practical point of view. This research focuses on the technology of creating autonomous self-healing concrete using a biological crack-healing mechanism. The research methodology consisted of four main stages, including an analysis of the already conducted global studies, ecological and economic analysis, the prospects and advantages of further studies, as well as a discussion and the conclusions. A total of 257 works from about 10 global databases were analyzed. An overview of the physical, mechanical and operational properties of bioconcrete and their changes is presented, depending on the type of active bacteria and the method of their introduction into the concrete mixture. An analysis of the influence of the automatic addition of various types of bacteria on various properties of self-healing bioconcrete is carried out, and an assessment of the influence of the method of adding bacteria to concrete on the process of crack healing is also given. A comparative analysis of various techniques for creating self-healing bioconcrete was performed from the point of view of technical progress, scientific potential, the methods of application of this technology, and their resulting advantages, considered as the factor impacting on strength and life cycle. The main conditions for a quantitative assessment of the sustainability and the possibility of the industrial implementation of the technology of self-healing bioconcrete are identified and presented. Various techniques aimed at improving the recovery process of such materials are considered. An assessment of the influence of the strength of cement mortar after adding bacteria to it is also given. Images obtained using electron microscopy methods are analyzed in relation to the life cycle of bacteria in mineral deposits of microbiological origin. Current gaps and future research prospects are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.