ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Multiscale Analysis of Sandwich Beams with Polyurethane Foam Core: A Comparative Study of Finite Element Methods and Radial Point Interpolation Method.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization Design and Mechanical Performance Study of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Composite Load-Carrying Structures for Subway Driver Cabin.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive multiscale analysis of sandwich beams with a polyurethane foam (PUF) core, delivering a numerical comparison between finite element methods (FEMs) and a meshless method: the radial point interpolation method (RPIM). This work aims to combine RPIM with homogenisation techniques for multiscale analysis, being divided in two phases. In the first phase, bulk PUF material was modified by incorporating circular holes to create PUFs with varying volume fractions. Then, using a homogenisation technique coupled with FEM and four versions of RPIM, the homogenised mechanical properties of distinct PUF with different volume fractions were determined. It was observed that RPIM formulations, with higher-order integration schemes, are capable of approximating the solution and field smoothness of high-order FEM formulations. However, seeking a comparable field smoothness represents prohibitive computational costs for RPIM formulations. In a second phase, the obtained homogenised mechanical properties were applied to large-scale sandwich beam problems with homogeneous and approximately functionally graded cores, showing RPIM's capability to closely approximate FEM results. The analysis of stress distributions along the thickness of the beam highlighted RPIM's tendency to yield lower stress values near domain edges, albeit with convergence towards agreement among different formulations. It was found that RPIM formulations with lower nodal connectivity are very efficient, balancing computational cost and accuracy. Overall, this study shows RPIM's viability as an alternative to FEM for addressing practical elasticity applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.