Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336128›Full record

ArticleBiology2024

Simulated High Throughput Sequencing Datasets: A Crucial Tool for Validating Bioinformatic Pathogen Detection Pipelines.

Andres S Espindola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andres S EspindolaDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9658-0673

Funding

Oklahoma State University Agricultural Experiment Station Hatch Project OKL03271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The validation of diagnostic assays in plant pathogen detection is a critical area of research. It requires the use of both negative and positive controls containing a known quantity of the target pathogen, which are crucial elements when calculating analytical sensitivity and specificity, among other diagnostic performance metrics. High Throughput Sequencing (HTS) is a method that allows the simultaneous detection of a theoretically unlimited number of plant pathogens. However, accurately identifying the pathogen from HTS data is directly related to the bioinformatic pipeline utilized and its effectiveness at correctly assigning reads to their associated taxa. To this day, there is no consensus about the pipeline that should be used to detect the pathogens in HTS data, and results often undergo review and scientific evaluation. It is, therefore, imperative to establish HTS resources tailored for evaluating the performance of bioinformatic pipelines utilized in plant pathogen detection. Standardized artificial HTS datasets can be used as a benchmark by allowing users to test their pipelines for various pathogen infection scenarios, some of the most prevalent being multiple infections, low titer pathogens, mutations, and new strains, among others. Having these artificial HTS datasets in the hands of HTS diagnostic assay validators can help resolve challenges encountered when implementing bioinformatics pipelines for routine pathogen detection. Offering these purely artificial HTS datasets as benchmarking tools will significantly advance research on plant pathogen detection using HTS and enable a more robust and standardized evaluation of the bioinformatic methods, thereby enhancing the field of plant pathogen detection.

Indexed as

benchmarkcontrolsdetectionHTSpathogensequencingsimulation

Identifiers

PMID39336128
PMCPMC11428249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.