Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336095›Full record

ArticleBiology2024

Comparative Study of

Adoración Barros-Rodríguez, Pamela Pacheco, María Peñas-Corte, Antonio J Fernández-González, José F Cobo-Díaz, Yasmira Enrique-Cruz, Maximino Manzanera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adoración Barros-RodríguezInstitute for Water Research and Department of Microbiology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Pamela PachecoInstitute for Water Research and Department of Microbiology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
María Peñas-CorteBiopharma Research S.A (ECONATUR Group), P. Industrial Autovía Norte, C/ Montecillo S/N, 14100 La Carlota, Spain.
Antonio J Fernández-GonzálezEstación Experimental del Zaidín, Department of Soil and Plant Microbiology, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 18008 Granada, Spain.
José F Cobo-DíazDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0898-2358
Yasmira Enrique-CruzVitaNtech Biotechnology S.L, Av. de la Innovación, 1, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Maximino ManzaneraInstitute for Water Research and Department of Microbiology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9555-7490

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación DIN2019-010903Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2021-127623OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The market for bacteria as agricultural biofertilizers is growing rapidly, offering plant-growth stimulants; biofungicides; and, more recently, protectors against extreme environmental factors, such as drought. This abundance makes it challenging for the end user to decide on the product to use. In this work, we describe the isolation of a strain of

Indexed as

agricultural protection against stress indexbiofertilizer efficiencybiofungicidesmicrobial biodiversity

Identifiers

PMID39336095
PMCPMC11428984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.