Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336041›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Development of Ambiguity Processing Is Explained by an Inverted U-Shaped Curve.

Anna Manelis, Rachel Miceli, Skye Satz, Stephen J Suss, Hang Hu, Amelia Versace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna ManelisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6605-5130
Rachel MiceliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Skye SatzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1351-2502
Stephen J SussDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Hang HuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Amelia VersaceDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9925-5203

Funding

Response Evaluation of Acute Cortisol in mTBI (REACT)R01MH114881 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Anthony P Kontos, Amelia Versace · 2018 to 2026
$6.2M
The contribution of aberrant anticipatory processing to spectrum depression and mania, and cognitive and emotional dysfunction in major depressive and bipolar disordersR01MH114870 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MANELIS, ANNA · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114870NIMH NIH HHS R01MH114870NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114881NIMH NIH HHS R01MH114881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the developmental trajectories for recognizing facial expressions is important for a better understanding of development of psychiatric disorders. In this study, we examined the recognition of emotional and neutral facial expressions in 93 typically developing adolescents and adults. The Emotion Intensity Rating task required participants to rate the intensity of emotional expression in happy, neutral, and sad faces on a scale from 1 to 9. A score of '5' had to be assigned to neutral faces, scores between '6' (slightly happy) and '9' (very happy) to happy faces, and scores between '4' (slightly sad) and '1' (very sad) to sad faces. Mixed effects models were used to examine the effects of age and emotion on recognition accuracy, reaction time (RT), and emotional intensity. Participants tended to misjudge neutral faces as sad. Adolescents were less accurate than adults for neutral face recognition. There were significant quadratic effects of age on accuracy (negative quadratic effect) and RT (positive quadratic effect). The most accurate and fastest performance was observed in 25- to 35-year-old subjects. This trajectory may be associated with prefrontal cortex maturation, which provides top-down control over the heightened amygdala response to ambiguity that may be misinterpreted as emotional content.

Indexed as

adolescentsadultsambiguityemotionsfacial expressionsU-shaped trajectory

Identifiers

PMID39336041
PMCPMC11429131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.